(imported "History" section from Wikipedia) Tag: sourceedit |
(→History: reference) Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
He had advocated transition to the calendar on January 1, 2006 as that is a year in which his calendar and the Gregorian calendar begin the year on the same day. After that date passed, he recommended dropping off December 31, 2006 to start in 2007, or dropping December 30 and 31, 2007 to start 2008.<ref>[http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendarDir/schedule.html "What if We MISS 2006 January 1 Sunday?"]</ref> |
He had advocated transition to the calendar on January 1, 2006 as that is a year in which his calendar and the Gregorian calendar begin the year on the same day. After that date passed, he recommended dropping off December 31, 2006 to start in 2007, or dropping December 30 and 31, 2007 to start 2008.<ref>[http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendarDir/schedule.html "What if We MISS 2006 January 1 Sunday?"]</ref> |
||
− | In late 2011 the calendar was revised by Johns Hopkins economist [[Steve Hanke]] by moving the leap week from the middle to the end of the year and renaming it "Extra", producing the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar. The target date for universal adoption was January 1, 2017 then, but has been postponed to 2018,<ref name="econographic"/> when the calendar design was changed in early 2016 to adopt Monday as the start of the week, quarter and year, to better comply with existing international standard [[ISO 8601]]. |
+ | In late 2011 the calendar was revised by Johns Hopkins economist [[Steve Hanke]] by moving the leap week from the middle to the end of the year and renaming it "Extra", producing the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar. The target date for universal adoption was January 1, 2017 then, but has been postponed to 2018,<ref name="econographic">[http://econographic.com/test/?utm_source=Hanke-Henry+Calendar What is the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar?]</ref> when the calendar design was changed in early 2016 to adopt Monday as the start of the week, quarter and year, to better comply with existing international standard [[ISO 8601]]. |
== Year layout == |
== Year layout == |
Revision as of 13:16, 1 March 2016
This page uses content from the English Wikipedia. The original article was at Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. As with the Calendar Wikia, the text of Wikipedia is available under Creative Commons License. See Wikia:Licensing. |
The Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar, devised by Steve H. Hanke and Richard Conn Henry, is a proposed new calendar which aims to reform the current Gregorian Calendar by making every year identical. With the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar, every calendar date always falls on the same day of the week. It is basically the same as the Common-Civil-Calendar-and-Time calendar.
History
In 2004, Richard Conn Henry, a professor of astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, proposed the adoption of a calendar known as Common-Civil-Calendar-and-Time, which he described as a modification to a proposal by Robert McClenon. This version had essentially the same structure given above, but inserted its leap week named "Newton" between June and July. The leap rule was chosen to match the ISO week leap rule, to minimize the variation in the start of the year relative to the Gregorian calendar.
He had advocated transition to the calendar on January 1, 2006 as that is a year in which his calendar and the Gregorian calendar begin the year on the same day. After that date passed, he recommended dropping off December 31, 2006 to start in 2007, or dropping December 30 and 31, 2007 to start 2008.[1]
In late 2011 the calendar was revised by Johns Hopkins economist Steve Hanke by moving the leap week from the middle to the end of the year and renaming it "Extra", producing the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar. The target date for universal adoption was January 1, 2017 then, but has been postponed to 2018,[2] when the calendar design was changed in early 2016 to adopt Monday as the start of the week, quarter and year, to better comply with existing international standard ISO 8601.
Year layout
|
|
|
|
Correcting for drift
While many calendar reforms aim to make the calendar more accurate, the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar focuses on making the calendar perennial, so that every date falls on the same day of the week, year after year.[3] The familiar drift of weekdays with respect to dates results from the fact that the number of days in a physical year (one full orbit of earth around the sun, approximately 365.24 days) is not a multiple of seven. By reducing common years to 364 days (52 weeks), and adding an extra week every five or six years, the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar eliminates weekday drift and synchronizes the calendar year with the seasonal change as the Earth circles the Sun. The extra week, or "mini-month", known as "Xtr (or Extra)",[3] would occur every year that either begins or ends in a Thursday on the corresponding Gregorian calendar.[3] The extra week would fall between the end of December and the beginning of January. Leap weeks in 2015, 2020, 2026, 2032, 2037, 2043, 2048, 2054, 2060 …
Under the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar there are two 30 day months followed by one month of 31 days. While the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar changes the length of the months, the week and days remain the same.[4]
Advantages
- Holidays such as Christmas and New Year's Day as well as birthdays always occur on the same day of the week every year.
- The calendar itself is permanent, it does not change year to year, with the exception of the need to add a week at the end of every 5 or 6 years.
- Quarters all have the same number of days simplifying financial calculations. This calendar would also have prevented Apple’s Q4 2012 reporting fiasco. [5]
- Unlike many other reform proposals, it does not change the days of the week.
- The calendar starts on the same day every year, Sunday, the 1st of January.
- As in the Gregorian calendar, Sunday to Sunday is always seven days, as is Saturday to Saturday, or Friday to Friday. Because no days are ever added outside a seven-day week, there should be no objection from religious groups concerned about weekly holy days. (In proposals that add single days outside the week, a true "seventh day" of rest or worship would drift between weekends and weekdays.)
Disadvantages
- Not as precisely aligned with the solar year as the existing Gregorian calendar and some proposed reform calendars.
- Requires continued use of the Gregorian calendar for certain agricultural purposes.
- All computer date-handling will have to be fixed, which will be much more complicated than the Y2K fix.
- US-biased, not compatible with international standards, such as ISO 8601, which start the week on Monday, hence also the week year. This issue could be resolved by modifying the calendar to begin in a year where 1 January falls on a Monday, instead of a Sunday. e.g. Monday, 1 January 2018 instead of Sunday, 1 January 2012.
- There is no 31st of October, removing Halloween from the current date.
References
- ↑ "What if We MISS 2006 January 1 Sunday?"
- ↑ What is the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar?
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 "The Hanke-Henry Date and Time, Everywhere in the World"
- ↑ "Is It Time to Overhaul the Calendar?", by Stephanie Pappas, Scientific American.
- ↑ [1], GlobeAsia, 2013
External links
- Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar Proposal
- "Is it time to overhaul the calendar? Profs have a plan", by Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer, 28 December 2011
- "Proposed calendar would make it same exact day, next year", By Elizabeth Weise, USA Today, 29 December 2011
- "Changing Times" by Steve H. Hanke and Richard Conn Henry, Cato Institute
- "Proposed New Calendar Would Make Time Rational", By Brandon Keim, 28 December 2011
- Press Release: "Time for a Change? Johns Hopkins Scholars Say Calendar Needs Serious Overhaul"
- "Taking Calendar Reform Viral" by Steve H. Hanke, Cato Institute
- "Taking Calendar Reform Viral" by Steve H. Hanke, Huffington Post
- http://www.stratfor.com/image/structure-hanke-henry-permanent-calendar